Financial

Cross-bank fraud detection requires shared model training, but legal teams reject raw transaction sharing. Every training contribution is cryptographically proven.

Book a Demo
Overview

Shared fraud intelligence. Zero raw transactions shared.

Competing institutions train shared fraud intelligence without surrendering a single transaction. When an examiner challenges the model, your team pulls reproducible, cryptographic evidence — not a defensive memo.

0Raw Transactions Shared

Cross-bank fraud signal computed via secure aggregation — no pooled transaction data, ever.

4Frameworks Mapped

FFIEC, FinCEN, NYDFS 500, and GLBA requirements satisfied by attested runtime records.

0Update Readability

Individual model updates stay cryptographically unreadable — even to STEAV.

4–6 wksTo First Attested Run

A signed execution record ready for examination within the first engagement cycle.

Examination readiness

What the examiner sees is what the platform proved.

FFIEC · SR 11-7 model risk

Attested eval and benchmark stages produce the model documentation examiners ask for — as a byproduct of running.

NYDFS Part 500

The tamper-evident audit log satisfies audit-trail requirements. Any auditor with access verifies independently.

GLBA

Raw transactions never leave the institution. Secure aggregation keeps individual updates unreadable.

FinCEN · AML

Cross-institution graph learning without data pooling — provable contribution, no shared customer data.

Secure aggregation

Competing institutions. One shared model. No shared data.

Each bank trains locally; only proven model updates leave the perimeter. Secure aggregation combines them without any single update being readable — even to STEAV.

Federation / liveAggregating
Institutions
9
Raw records shared
0
Update readable
None
Proven contributions
100%

Where it applies

Where banks put it to work

Use cases
Cross-bank fraud detectionShared fraud signal across institutions without a single shared transaction.
Credit scoring for underbanked populationsBroader signal from more institutions, with fairness metrics you can show a regulator.
AML graph learning · document KYCNetwork-level detection across institutions without pooling customer records.
Recommended deploymentSecure BYOC

Inside your cloud perimeter.

CID runs natively inside your cloud accounts. Customer transactions, model weights, and core logic never touch STEAV’s infrastructure.

Data sovereignty

Absolute network isolation. Customer records remain inside your regulated perimeter at all times.

Infrastructure

Hosted and self-managed GPU options available for institutions operating their own fleets.

Become a Partner

First pipeline run in 4–6 weeks. First production federation in 8–12.

Run a pilot
Partner with us

Examiners get evidence, not assertions.

Stop assembling examination binders. STEAV generates immutable, verifiable proofs of your shared-model pipelines in real time — giving examiners exactly what they need without the engineering overhead.

What a pilot includes
A dedicated environment inside your cloud perimeter
Your first cryptographically signed execution record
An examiner-ready evidence export for a real review
A named STEAV engineer through go-live
WEEK 0
Scoping

We map one fraud workflow and stand up an environment in your cloud.

WEEK 4–6
First attested run

A signed execution record you can hand straight to an examiner.

WEEK 8–12
Production federation

Live cross-institution training producing evidence on every run.